If anything 2012 Sauternes and Barsac is a little better than expected in what was an extremely difficult harvest in the region, spoiled by vintage rain. The very best wines are light yet with enough depth to make appetizing sweet wine that will be comparatively early maturing. A few are in a strange sort of purgatory, a half-way house position, between sweet styles and the off-dry, emphasizing the kind of all-or-nothing risk taking that Bordeaux’s bravest winemakers undertake here each vintage. There’s always the danger that you might get left high and dry in Sauternes [no pun intended] and some brave souls clearly have.
The harvest is always complex here even in the trio of excellent back-to-back vintages 2009-2011. Great Sauternes years rely on the widespread presence of the concentrating powers of botrytis cinerea, the so-called ‘noble rot’ that requires a strange alchemy between sun, wind and moisture to develop. The very dry spell of weather that lasted from mid-July through to the end of September in 2012, though good for general ripening and the white wine harvest elsewhere [especially in Pessac-Léognan], provided conditions obviously unfavourable to the development of botrytis. So proprietors here had little choice but to let the grapes hang out on the line like laundry well into October in pursuit of rot of the very best sort. And that’s when the weather turned distinctly tricky. It’s difficult to generalize, but spells of heavy rain rather ruined things, and at critical moments a drying wind and the sun failed to materialize.
The overall results, though variable, are perhaps remarkable when you consider the vintage. Apart from the odd slice of good fortune I think we can put this down to proprietors writing off large sections of the harvest and the wines. What’s in the glass represents the strictest selection of the strictest selection, both in the vineyard and in the chais. This makes the vintage extremely good value if you look at the effort put in and the financial sacrifices made. Still that’s the last thing most consumers will ponder. More likely they will remember 2012 as the year Chateau d’Yquem [followed by Rieussec and few others] announced that the vintage simply wasn’t good enough for them to release a grand vin. A resounding ‘Bravo!’ then, surely, to those who did. The best have confounded expectations and managed to produce wine of true elegance and finesse.
The pick of the crop? For me the best amongst the premier cru chateaux are Sigalas Rabaud, Rabaud-Promis, de Rayne-Vigneau, La Tour Blanche and Coutet. Then amongst the second crus Doisy-Daëne, Doisy-Védrines, de Malle and de Myrat have made elegant and potentially attractive wines. There’s a fair margin of error here – not downwards but upwards. Sauternes is so very tricky to judge as an infant [surely the most tricky of all Bordeaux’s wines to assess early on?] that I’d expect all the wines below to fill out and develop further in cask and in bottle [in the short to medium term at least].
So should you buy them? Yes. Now? I’d love to be able to say yes too but the stark truth is that there is of course no hurry. The region and the wines could probably do with your patronage and business but the market is still awash with lots of fine Sauternes and Barsac at good prices. I’d probably seek out 2009 and 2010 first. These are already in bottle and delicious. Then I’d consider 2011 before 2012…
Below are the notes on the sixteen wines in the order that they were tasted at the Union des Grand Crus de Bordeaux event held at Chateau La Lagune on Thursday April 11, 2013. They were presented by classification, lower to higher, but as you’ll see that’s not to say that the ultimate quality of the wines lies exactly in that manner.
Chateau Bastor Lamontagne, [Sauternes]
Palest straw; waxy tones; some flint; lightly sweet. 80% Sémillon, 20% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 84-86
Chateau Romer [Fargues], Second Cru Classé
Palest green/gold; some candy tones; elegance if lacks sweetness and length. 90% Sémillon, 5% Muscadelle, 5% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 84-86
Chateau de Malle [Preignac], Second Cru Classé
Green gold; some wax and a little butter; palate elegant and poised with sweetness. Fine and good length. Refreshing. Good effort. 75% Sémillon, 25% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 87-89+
Chateau Suau [Barsac], Second Cru Classé
Pale gold; some cream; body; semi-sweet palate; certainly very different. Aperitif? UGC April 11, 2013. 84-86
Chateau Nairac [Barsac], Second Cru Classé
Pale straw; white wine nose; sauvignon and citrus notes; has zap and zest but little sweetness; gooseberry citrus qualities remain. UGC April 11, 2013. 85-86
Chateau Broustet [Barsac], Second Cru Classé
Pale straw; some burnt notes; oak on the palate; not sweet. All at sea to me. 75% Sémillon, 15% Sauvignon Blanc, 10% Muscadelle. UGC April 11, 2013. 82-84?
Chateau Filhot [Sauternes], Second Cru Classé
Pale straw; wet wool; apples some burnt toffee; more wet wool on the palate; spikey. 60% Sémillon, 36% Sauvignon Blanc, 4% Muscadelle. UGC April 11, 2013. 83-85
Chateau Doisy-Védrines [Barsac], Second Cru Classé
Pale green/gold; quite elegant; classic almost; fresh tones with some grapefruit and citrus notes; creamy palate with some sweetness; quite tight and overall feeling of a very good effort in the circumstances. 80% Sémillion, 20% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 88-90
Chateau Doisy Daëne [Barsac], Second Cru Classé
Washed gold green; fresh nose; some candy and fruit salad tones; quite open; fairly full palate with elegance and nice balance. Good effort again. UGC April 11, 2013. 88-90
Chateau de Myrat [Barsac], Second Cru Classé
Pale green/gold; some honey on the nose; feels fullish and attractive; little dryness to the palate [aromas suggested a sweeter wine]; some wet wool; may settle further. 82% Sémillon, 10% Muscadelle, 8% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 86-88+
Chateau Sigalas Rabaud [Bommes], Premier Cru Classé
Quite gold/grey in the glass; clean; nice honey; elegant; some oil and wax with butter tones; I’m enjoying this. Good length here. Excellent effort. 95% Sémillon, 5% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 88-90
Chateau Rabaud-Promis [Bommes], Premier Cru Classé
Quite golden; some wet wool/wet dog; honey; fruit on the palate; some butterscotch; full-ish; again good effort. Quite sweet on the finish. 85% Sémillon, 15% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 87-89+
Chateau Coutet [Barsac], Premier Cru Classé
Deepish straw; honeycomb note; ginger; sweet palate; some biscuit tones; more sweetness than some though sample lacks a bit of zing. Good length. 75% Sémillon, 20% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 88-90
Chateau de Rayne Vigneau [Bommes], Premier Cru Classé
Pale straw/washed green; nice creamy tones; feels there is depth; peachy fruit; palate has honey and cream; nice sweetness and feels balanced. Elegant and good effort for the vintage. 80% Sémillon, 20% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 88-90+ [Earlier note] Pale green/gold; attractive nose; fine and elegant; honeycomb; mid-weight palate; some length and feels a very good effort. Tasted at Chateau Meyney April 11, 2013. 88-90+
Clos Haut-Peyraguey [Bommes], Premier Cru Classé
Quite gold; little dumb at first; cream; quite sweet palate but lacks a bit of zap and zing. Not a great sample or expressive sample. 95% Sémillon, 5% Sauvignon Blanc. UGC April 11, 2013. 86-87?
Chateau Lafaurie-Peyraguey [Bommes], Premier Cru Classé
Pale green/gold; peachy; some cream; little grapefruit and citrus tones; some lees; quite broad; palate quite full but not that sweet. Elegant style. 93% Sémillon, 6% Sauvignon Blanc, 1% Muscadelle. UGC April 11, 2013. 87-89
Chateau La Tour Blanche [Bommes], Premier Cru Classé
Green/gold; some honey; cream; depth here; nice entry on the palate; quite appetizing; lightish but there is length and a touch of honey on the finish. 92% Sémillon, 5.5% Sauvignon Blanc, 2.5% Muscadelle. UGC April 11, 2013. 88-90